In "The Future of Political Islam", Fuller engages
two broad questions: what is political Islam and how should it develop in the
future? In answering the first, he has done an excellent job of contextualizing
his subject, locating its development within a historical trajectory, and
clearly and convincingly outlining those problems for which Islamists claim to
have solutions.
In his introduction, he makes it clear that his goal in writing the book is to
counter those analyses which view the rise of political Islam purely as an
injection of religious irrationality into the political realm. Instead, he
claims that political Islam is a rational response to modernity and all its
attendant problems. It is an engagement with modernity, not a rejection of it.
Islamists, he claims, whether they are liberal and more openly
"modernizing" or more conservative, are incorporating the language
and structures of modernity - political representation, human rights, civil society
- into Muslim culture.
This explanatory account of political Islam is the book's strength. Fuller's
attempt at the second question - how should political Islam develop in the
future - is less convincing. It is informed fully by his desire to incorporate
the Muslim world as seamlessly as possible into the liberal-democratic ethos of
the West. This desire infects the more descriptive aspect of his book as well,
possibly resulting in an overemphasis on liberal Islamists and their
compatibility (or, indeed, adoption) of Western political values.
While an accusation of an Orientalist attitude might not be entirely wrong, it
would be misplaced. Fuller is sincere in his respect for the Muslim world and
its ability to solve its own problems. Instead, I think his approach in this
regard is more of an outgrowth of the disbelief in alternatives to the current
world order, the kind of assumptions which underpin Francis Fukuyama's
assertion that liberal democracy as practiced in the developed world is the
last evolution of the political system, the "end of history".
This position, from which he sets out his recommendations for Islamists,
unfortunately leaves unexamined the degree to which Islamists are attempting to
establish a unique system that may incorporate much of the language and
institutions of liberal democracy, but could establish new relationships
between political, economic, social and cultural institutions. As a result, the
concluding chapter, from which the book's title is taken, is the most disappointing,
its conclusions obvious and lacking originality (or maybe they only seem so
now, four years after the invasion of Iraq and the publication of this book).
Perhaps I am asking too much. Fuller's book might best be described as a
"thorough overview", with each chapter broken down into small
sections, some only a paragraph long. This makes it easy to dip in and out of,
but can also serve to compartmentalize the information and disconnect some of
the broader arguments, leaving me with a sense of shallow analysis, despite how
thoroughly he has tackled so many of the different aspects of political Islam.
The writing quality is also a problem. Perfect prose is not crucial for this
kind of book, but barely a page went by without a glaring mistake. Some editing
is sorely needed.
Despite these criticisms, Fuller's book is incredibly useful and important. His
description of the political, social and economic conditions from which
political Islam has arisen is informed, honest and, above all, encouraging. I wouldn't
hesitate to recommend it.
Review of The Future of Political Islam, by Graham Fuller